best regards

mahedi

Hope this help

Sundance

import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.color.*;
import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.convolution.*;
import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.render.*;
import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.noise.*;
import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.distortion.*;
import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.morphological.*;
import de.popforge.imageprocessing.core.*;

this classes could not be found.

please help me about that.

VerifyError: Error #1014: Class de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters::FilterQueue could not be found. at global$init()

Here’s what I did to create the .fla in the IDE:
* set the .fla project size/fps to same in Main.as
* saved the .fla in the same folder as ImageProcessing.swc
* set the .fla document class to Main and validated it

Am I missing something, or is the lab demo “Flex-only” and there’s no way to convert it? Thank you.

P.S. this stuff is very cool, keep up the great work.

I just started with a threshold because that’s a very fast operation – but if I can’t even get that to run at decent speed, doing more advanced manipulation of the pixel data doesn’t seem possible, either.

Here’s how I did a simple threshold, which I thought to expand into some more complex processing. But if I comment out the if clauses and leave just the reading and writing, it still takes up most of CPU time, even with a 160×120 webcam image.

In the constructor:

frameData = new BitmapData(videoWidth, videoHeight, false);
frame = new Bitmap(frameData);
addChild(frame);
video = new Video(videoWidth, videoHeight);
camera = Camera.getCamera();
video.attachCamera(camera);

In the onEnterFrame callback function:

frameData.draw(video);
for (var py:int = 0; py

That is still a lot but quicker than normal loops take (about 1sec). But this is only faster for large images.

Just that you get an idea how it looks like. This is a part from a performance guide my company will release soon when I have some time to finalize it:

var y: int;
var x: int;
var m: Boolean = true;

if ( x == w || x == 0 )
{
if ( y++ == h )
break;
m = !m;
}
}

I’ve tried a regular for loop with GetPixel() then SetPixel(), and also doing GetPixels() then looping through the ByteArray and using SetPixels() at the end – but both of these methods end up taking 95% CPU time even without actually doing anything to the pixel data.

http://labs.blitzagency.com/?p=118

Anyways a class for that will be inside the next release.

Anycase thanks for ur job&ideas :)

import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.simplify.*;

and add instead

import de.popforge.imageprocessing.filters.noise.*;

I am sorry, I just updated the swc in the zip file but not the example. I will do so with the next release.

Thank u :)