Comments on: popforge sprintf http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2007/08/31/popforge-sprintf/ Actionscript3, Flash, Scala, Java, C#, C++, Algorithms & Imageprocessing Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:26:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: joa http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2007/08/31/popforge-sprintf/comment-page-1/#comment-157367 joa Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:13:35 +0000 http://blog.je2050.de/2007/08/31/popforge-sprintf/#comment-157367 float 1.0f with %.2f should format to 1.00 -- otherwise it is wrong. It could be that I fixed this a while ago. But it is quiet simple if you dig into the code and search for yourself. float 1.0f with %.2f should format to 1.00 — otherwise it is wrong. It could be that I fixed this a while ago. But it is quiet simple if you dig into the code and search for yourself.

]]> By: Steff http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2007/08/31/popforge-sprintf/comment-page-1/#comment-157167 Steff Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:26:24 +0000 http://blog.je2050.de/2007/08/31/popforge-sprintf/#comment-157167 For e, E, and f specifiers, isn't the precision supposed to specify the number of digits to be printed after the decimal point? That was my understanding from the C++ spec. The class currently uses precision to specify the total number of integers (eg: so 4.99 formatted under $%.2f looks like $5.0, when it should really look like $4.99...) Is there a different spec that you followed for this? For e, E, and f specifiers, isn’t the precision supposed to specify the number of digits to be printed after the decimal point? That was my understanding from the C++ spec. The class currently uses precision to specify the total number of integers (eg: so 4.99 formatted under $%.2f looks like $5.0, when it should really look like $4.99…)

Is there a different spec that you followed for this?

]]>