<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reducer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/</link>
	<description>Actionscript3, Flash, Scala, Java, C#, C++, Algorithms &#38; Imageprocessing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario Pelella</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-257850</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario Pelella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-257850</guid>
		<description>Oh man! it works like a charm!

is there a version for reducing audio files?
i use flex and it seems there are a lot of limitations in using low freq or low kbs mp3 files

anyone there could give me the best solution about best audio compression method in flex? :D

i like your blog very much :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man! it works like a charm!</p>
<p>is there a version for reducing audio files?<br />
i use flex and it seems there are a lot of limitations in using low freq or low kbs mp3 files</p>
<p>anyone there could give me the best solution about best audio compression method in flex? :D</p>
<p>i like your blog very much :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-190442</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-190442</guid>
		<description>I swapped in your test rainbow png for my png of little variation and... file size reduction goodness!  Obviously, I guess the type of image factors into the savings.  My images do not have that much variation, so I guess the savings are moot.  Any event, this was educational and fun.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swapped in your test rainbow png for my png of little variation and&#8230; file size reduction goodness!  Obviously, I guess the type of image factors into the savings.  My images do not have that much variation, so I guess the savings are moot.  Any event, this was educational and fun.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-190440</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-190440</guid>
		<description>I am not able to further compress swfs with pngs with alphas and using quality 1.0.  

In your documentation you say:
&quot;- The best way to reducer is embedding PNG files with an alpha channel and then using the -quality 1.0 setting. This will keep the best quality but your SWF will still shrink a lot.&quot;

Is there an additional parameter or setting I should be using?  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not able to further compress swfs with pngs with alphas and using quality 1.0.  </p>
<p>In your documentation you say:<br />
&#8220;- The best way to reducer is embedding PNG files with an alpha channel and then using the -quality 1.0 setting. This will keep the best quality but your SWF will still shrink a lot.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is there an additional parameter or setting I should be using?  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-190274</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 08:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-190274</guid>
		<description>How to use!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to use!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleclech</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-180491</link>
		<dc:creator>pleclech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-180491</guid>
		<description>@Joa you´re welcome for the patch, thanks for the Apparat tools :)

@Arnoud Thanks for sending a sample file. 

Patrick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joa you´re welcome for the patch, thanks for the Apparat tools :)</p>
<p>@Arnoud Thanks for sending a sample file. </p>
<p>Patrick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoud Bos</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-180383</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoud Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-180383</guid>
		<description>Hi Joa,

Thanx, works great! 
Gotta say i love this tool, it&#039;s so useful! 1.4 meg to 800k without visible 
quality loss is awesome!

thanx again,

Arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joa,</p>
<p>Thanx, works great!<br />
Gotta say i love this tool, it&#8217;s so useful! 1.4 meg to 800k without visible<br />
quality loss is awesome!</p>
<p>thanx again,</p>
<p>Arnoud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joa</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-180297</link>
		<dc:creator>joa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-180297</guid>
		<description>Anoud,

please choose the Recuder download from apparat.googlecode.com which should work.


Best,

Joa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anoud,</p>
<p>please choose the Recuder download from apparat.googlecode.com which should work.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Joa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoud Bos</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-180294</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoud Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-180294</guid>
		<description>Hi Joa,

i needed to update the project of which i posted the problematic swf files.
After checking out taas from svn and rebuilding i tried the fixed reducer, but still the images smaller than 16px disappear on the player.

is the fix already in svn? or do i need to do something with 
deblock or keep-premultiplied? Not sure where those are for.

thanx,

Arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joa,</p>
<p>i needed to update the project of which i posted the problematic swf files.<br />
After checking out taas from svn and rebuilding i tried the fixed reducer, but still the images smaller than 16px disappear on the player.</p>
<p>is the fix already in svn? or do i need to do something with<br />
deblock or keep-premultiplied? Not sure where those are for.</p>
<p>thanx,</p>
<p>Arnoud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joa</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178605</link>
		<dc:creator>joa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178605</guid>
		<description>The bug has been fixed by Patrick LeClech who submitted a patch to the open source Apparat project :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bug has been fixed by Patrick LeClech who submitted a patch to the open source Apparat project :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoud Bos</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178600</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoud Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178600</guid>
		<description>Hi Joa,

awesome! we wanted to use it in a big project, but we use small images.
With this fix we can use it :-)

thanx for the fast fix!

Arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joa,</p>
<p>awesome! we wanted to use it in a big project, but we use small images.<br />
With this fix we can use it :-)</p>
<p>thanx for the fast fix!</p>
<p>Arnoud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joa</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178372</link>
		<dc:creator>joa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178372</guid>
		<description>Anoud: Your bug has been fixed. Thank you for the example SWFs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anoud: Your bug has been fixed. Thank you for the example SWFs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoud Bos</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178099</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoud Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178099</guid>
		<description>Nice, 

i&#039;ll check back in a while.

thanx!

arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, </p>
<p>i&#8217;ll check back in a while.</p>
<p>thanx!</p>
<p>arnoud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joa</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178041</link>
		<dc:creator>joa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178041</guid>
		<description>Cool thank you. I have heard about taht error before but I was not able to reproduce it. With those SWFs I will be finally able to fix it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool thank you. I have heard about taht error before but I was not able to reproduce it. With those SWFs I will be finally able to fix it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoud Bos</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178036</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoud Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178036</guid>
		<description>sorry the code for the play button was filtered out....

here it is:

mx:Button id=&quot;playPauseButton
click=&quot;togglePlay()&quot;
toggle=&quot;true&quot;
width=&quot;18&quot;
height=&quot;18&quot;
icon=&quot;@Embed(source=&#039;assets/images/play.png&#039;)&quot;
toolTip=&quot;Play&quot;/

cheers,

Arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry the code for the play button was filtered out&#8230;.</p>
<p>here it is:</p>
<p>mx:Button id=&#8221;playPauseButton<br />
click=&#8221;togglePlay()&#8221;<br />
toggle=&#8221;true&#8221;<br />
width=&#8221;18&#8243;<br />
height=&#8221;18&#8243;<br />
icon=&#8221;@Embed(source=&#8217;assets/images/play.png&#8217;)&#8221;<br />
toolTip=&#8221;Play&#8221;/</p>
<p>cheers,</p>
<p>Arnoud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoud Bos</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-178035</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoud Bos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-178035</guid>
		<description>Hi Joa,

very nice tool,

I tried it with a .swf of 1.4 meg and it was reduced to 800k nice!
there was 1 problem.

some small icons disappear after optimization.

optimization:
java -jar reducer.jar -input the_romantic_manifesto.swf -output the_romantic_manifesto_0.9.swf -quality 0.9

as you can see online the icons of the music player disappeared.
they are 16x16 px and are embedded in the regular way for example the play button:

&lt;code&gt;
    
&lt;/code&gt;

you can see the result online here. go to music (no sound is actually avaiable, just the swf&#039;s are there)
the first link is the original, the second the optimized.

http://www.theromanticmanifesto.com/the_romantic_manifesto.swf
http://www.theromanticmanifesto.com/the_romantic_manifesto_0.9.swf

if you want the source for testing let me know!

Arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joa,</p>
<p>very nice tool,</p>
<p>I tried it with a .swf of 1.4 meg and it was reduced to 800k nice!<br />
there was 1 problem.</p>
<p>some small icons disappear after optimization.</p>
<p>optimization:<br />
java -jar reducer.jar -input the_romantic_manifesto.swf -output the_romantic_manifesto_0.9.swf -quality 0.9</p>
<p>as you can see online the icons of the music player disappeared.<br />
they are 16&#215;16 px and are embedded in the regular way for example the play button:</p>
<p><code></p>
<p></code></p>
<p>you can see the result online here. go to music (no sound is actually avaiable, just the swf&#8217;s are there)<br />
the first link is the original, the second the optimized.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theromanticmanifesto.com/the_romantic_manifesto.swf" rel="nofollow">http://www.theromanticmanifesto.com/the_romantic_manifesto.swf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.theromanticmanifesto.com/the_romantic_manifesto_0.9.swf" rel="nofollow">http://www.theromanticmanifesto.com/the_romantic_manifesto_0.9.swf</a></p>
<p>if you want the source for testing let me know!</p>
<p>Arnoud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Day Two Marc Hibbins</title>
		<link>http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2009/08/08/reducer/comment-page-1/#comment-176086</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Day Two Marc Hibbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joa-ebert.com/?p=417#comment-176086</guid>
		<description>[...] there was Reducer, which reworks the JPG compression for SWF files to make them an incredible ten times smaller at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there was Reducer, which reworks the JPG compression for SWF files to make them an incredible ten times smaller at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

