I created a couple of programs like AS3doc and AS3V. Both have never really gotten any adoption because I canceled their development. The reason was that Adobe shortly before or after I finished my tool released a competitive tool. Given the fact that I work fulltime on audiotool.com it is hard for me to find some time off to develop those applications. Some of them are even not written for myself — like the FlexMojos code coverage.
However it happened again. I write a tool that is not even fully released yet and there comes Adobe around the corner with something that must have been in development for a while. Enough time to tell us that we can decide if we want to continue working on it or not.
I have no problem with Adobe developing such products. In fact I second that they have a Flex QA team which develops tools like FlexPMD and the recent coverage plug-in. However the way this process happens really frustrates me. Why would I want to work on something that Adobe is already developing somewhere silently and release it without giving anyone notice? But they do not owe me an explanation for what they do. It would also be arrogant to say that I demand to know upfront.
I am just sad that there is no dialog at all. This happened three times now. I will not continue doing this.
That does not mean I will stop working on Apparat and JITB. Only no more enterprise releated open source software.
First of all I think I have to clarify at least one thing. I have criticised Adobe in the past for a lof of reasons. Not because I do not like them or the technologies they produce but because I want to improve the Flash Platform. This is of course pure self-interest since Flash is a key technology for the 